Why I won’t work for a percentage of funds raised

My “day” job is consulting to non-profits, usually in the area of fundraising.  If you’ve been following this blog, you’lI know that I walked away from a wonderful position at a wonderful organization to hang out my own shingle.

I’m learning that quite a few non-profits are in a bit of a spot – – they need to start fundraising, but they don’t have money to support fundraising.  So they decide to do some fundraising to raise money so they can afford to start fundraising.

I find myself being given offers of work with the promise that I will be paid a percentage of the donations that are raised.  Although some fundraisers accept this type of arrangement, I’m not willing to do this.  I decided to include a page on my website regarding why I’m unable to follow this practice.  But first, I’m posting the key points here.  So don’t look for it at my website yet.  (But if you want to go to my website anyway, it’s at http://www.begifted.net.)

So, why are my fees not based on a percentage of money raised?

From a non-profit’s perspective, paying a fundraiser a percentage of funds raised makes perfect sense.  First of all, the organization doesn’t have to pay until actual money comes in the door.  Secondly, the fundraiser is presumably motivated to bring in as much money as possible.

However, there are several flaws with this payment model:

–          When money becomes the primary motivation for a fundraiser, the organization is at risk.  Good fundraising is based on relationships, but when money becomes the primary motivator, relationships are sacrificed for “quick wins.”   This can have serious financial and public relations consequences for the organization.

–          Good fundraising is a collaborative effort.  Ultimately, the organization raises the money through its promise and delivery of value to the people/issues it serves, a worthwhile mission, a solid reputation, and commitment to good fundraising practices.  A fundraiser’s success is dependent upon the support, connections, and decisions of the executive director and the board.

–          There are too many variables outside the fundraiser’s control.  Mismanagement, bad luck, or poor fundraising strategies in the past may have soured the public’s attitude towards a particular organization.   Or the Board may disregard certain recommendations made by the fundraiser, recommendations that may be critical to fundraising success.

–          Donor trust is eroded.  Most donors understand that running an organization incurs expenses.  When a fundraiser is paid by the hour or by the project, it is similar to paying for any other service, such as those provided by accountants, lawyers, cleaning companies, and internet providers.  However, donors do not like a percentage of their money being diverted from the “cause” and into someone’s pocket.  From the donor’s point of view, the fundraiser provides the same service to a $100 donor that she does to a $1 million donor, so why must the $1 million donor be penalized for making a larger gift?

–          The relationship is to be between the organization and the donor, not the fundraiser and the donor.  An hourly or by-project fee encourages proper relationship alignments.

–          And finally, the Association of Fundraising Professionals, of which I am a member, very strongly states that a percentage-based payment model is unethical.

Regrettably, some non-profits respond by telling me they’re unable to hire me, because they simply can’t afford to pay for fundraising until they raise some money.  Besides, their cause is so good that perhaps, they hint, I should work pro bono.  However, just about all of the non-profits I’m coming into contact with have causes that are so good that I should work pro-bono.  We call this “volunteering” and that’s not what I’m trying to do for a living.

Having said that, as a new consultant, I’ve allowed myself to work dirt cheap these past few months, because some of the causes really have resonated with me.  I’ve decided that my next step will be to put together some recommendations that I can give non-profits (for free) to help them find money, until that magical time when they can invest money into resource development.

And because my bills haven’t stopped coming in, and because I’ve already reduced my lifestyle to as Spartan of a level as I’m willing to go, my fees have now gone back up to something a bit closer to the standard fee of a new consultant.  I do feel good that no matter how hungry I’ve been these past few months, I’ve stuck to principles that I know are ethical.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s